Basic Information
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Full name | Stacy Tremayne Chism |
| Known spouse | Diana Amanda Chism |
| Children | Philip Chism, Isabella Christina Chism, additional daughters referenced in filings |
| Notable family connection | Father of Philip Chism, who was involved in a high profile criminal case in October 2013 |
| Public records | Appears in Tennessee family court documents naming him in a parenting and divorce matter |
| Military service | Reported service in Army National Guard, Tennessee, mid 1990s to early 2000s |
| Public mention locations | Tennessee, Massachusetts, Florida (locations referenced in media and filings) |
Family and relationships
Stacy Tremayne Chism is best known in public records as a parent and as a named party in family court documents. The family nucleus centers on Diana Amanda Chism, identified in filings as a spouse or former spouse, and on the children named in those documents. The household, according to the public paper trail, included at least three children: a son, Philip, and a daughter, Isabella, plus references to other daughters in parenting plans.
Diana Amanda Chism appears repeatedly in the family narrative as the mother who carried the immediate public burden when the family entered the national spotlight. The relationship between Stacy and Diana is recorded in a Tennessee court context, with legal documents referencing separation and a permanent parenting plan. Those filings frame the family in legal terms, with custody and parental responsibilities described in precise language. Family law is a kind of ledger, plain and exact, and these entries place names, dates, and responsibilities where memory might otherwise blur them.
Philip, the son, is the primary reason the family became the subject of wide media attention after an October 2013 incident. His age at that time placed him in mid adolescence, and the case that followed drew detailed reporting that mentioned his parents by name. Isabella is listed in public record aggregators as a sibling and daughter in the same family tree. These relationships read like a generational line drawn in ink; each name connects to the next in the paperwork that remains publicly accessible.
Career and public record for Stacy Tremayne Chism
Concrete career details for Stacy outside of family and limited public service references are sparse in mainstream narrative. The most consistent career-related fact in the record is reported military service in the Army National Guard during the 1990s and into the early 2000s, which suggests a period of disciplined, formal commitment that often shapes life afterward.
Beyond this service entry, there is little in the public domain that documents corporate positions, business ventures, or public achievements under Stacy’s name. Financial profiles, net worth estimates, or documented professional accolades do not appear as part of the publicly reported material. In short, the public record emphasizes family relationships and legal documentation over a catalog of professional milestones.
The 2013 case and media attention
October 2013 is a pivot point in the family story. A violent event involving the Chism family drew national attention, and coverage of that event repeatedly referenced family members by name in background detail. The legal trajectory that followed involved indictments, court proceedings, pleas, and sentences, with follow-up reporting in subsequent years. During and after this period, news coverage summarized the family history, noted parental names, and cited the existence of earlier family court records.
The media presence that flowed from the 2013 case created a halo of public curiosity that extended to relatives and household history. This attention acted like a spotlight that, once switched on, revealed the contours of a family life otherwise kept in private records. Names that would otherwise be ordinary became anchors in news timelines and legal logs.
Recent mentions and online presence
The family is mentioned sporadically in subsequent publications related to legal proceedings in the years following 2013. The public timeline was updated as new events transpired, and coverage of any follow-up occurrences or proceedings involving the son continued to make reference to the names of the parents and earlier family records. Although the content varies from real reporting to less trustworthy, repeated biographies, social media and aggregator pages share the same moniker.
The family’s online presence is inconsistent. While genealogical aggregators and content pages build a web of replicated information, verified personal accounts for Stacy are not prominent in mainstream press. The pattern is similar to a copier machine that is set to repeat; there isn’t much fresh detail as the same lines show on many pages.
Extended timeline
| Year | Event |
|---|---|
| Mid 1990s to early 2000s | Reported military service in Army National Guard |
| 1998 to early 2000s | Marriage and parenting events recorded in public record aggregators |
| 2001 | Family court documents in Tennessee reference parenting and separation matters |
| January 1999 | Birth year consistent with media age reporting for son Philip |
| April 2013 to October 2013 | Family appears in media as legal case develops; major public incident reported October 2013 |
| Late 2013 to 2016 | Criminal proceedings, trial, and sentencing phases receive broad coverage |
| 2014 to 2024 | Periodic follow-up reporting and legal updates referencing family background and subsequent incidents |
The timeline reads like a ledger, with family, court, and public events occupying distinct lines. Dates anchor the narrative, and the pattern of intermittent reporting marks the years that shaped public perception.
Public record characteristics
In this family story, public papers are procedural rather than poetic. Formal language is used in criminal court files, parenting plans, and divorce petitions to list relationships, custody agreements, and legal obligations. Names, dates, and designations are examples of fixed points found in these records. They provide precise coordinates that trace family ties, but they are not character studies. In order to provide the who, when, and where of a story, media outlets rely on this formal foundation.
Social impressions and the archive effect
The family’s presence in news archives acts like an imprint on paper. Once a name appears in court reports and major coverage, it remains discoverable. For Stacy, that archive is primarily composed of legal references and parental identification. The spotlight that once shone on a single case continues to illuminate associated entries in the archive, so the public image of the family is shaped by a small number of high intensity events rather than by a broad sweep of public life.
FAQ
Who is Stacy Tremayne Chism?
Stacy Tremayne Chism is a parent named in Tennessee family court documents and reported to have served in the Army National Guard; he is publicly known largely through family-related legal records.
Who are the immediate family members?
Immediate family referenced in public documentation includes spouse or former spouse Diana Amanda Chism, son Philip Chism, and daughter Isabella Christina Chism, plus additional daughters noted in filings.
Why did the family appear in national news?
The family drew national attention after an October 2013 criminal incident involving their son, which led to extensive legal proceedings and media coverage.
Are there professional achievements listed for Stacy?
Publicly available records note military service; there are no widely documented professional accolades or detailed career profiles under his name in mainstream reporting.
Where are the family’s public records filed?
Key family court documents appear in Tennessee family court filings and were cited in media coverage that referenced those records.
Is there an online profile for Stacy?
An authoritative, verified social media profile for Stacy is not prominent in mainstream coverage, while genealogical aggregators and content pages list related personal details.
